Do investors want a massive little bit of the pie? See how to negotiate them down.
Just how many times perhaps you have contemplated the $100,000 from outside investors who would like a 40 percent equity stake in your business? Simple math implies that if $100,000 is 40 percent of the firm’s value, then your firm should be worth $250,000. The problem is manufactured worse if no-one includes a clear rationale for why the firm will probably be worth $250,000. So if the offer negotiations simply select a random percentage, the business enterprise gets valued because of that percentage and the dollars invested. But that will not define the underlying known reasons for the business value, and that is clearly a significant problem for entrepreneurs in order to avoid.
The key to the issue has two distinct parts, both which come under a simple rule. First, make an effort and spend the amount of money to get a formal business valuation supplied by an independent alternative party. Too often, companies either don’t bother to create a definitive value on the business or they utilize a value that was loosely generated utilizing a simple guideline. Worse yet is if they pursue either of the two plans, the party providing the funds results in the driver’s seat in setting the worthiness for the business, which establishes the percentage ownership stake for the investment made. For instance, if an owner sits down with a potential investor and doesn’t have a value established before that meeting, the investor gains the upper hand and is able to offer a value to begin with the discussions. Devoid of a good value prepared also makes the dog owner appear relatively unsophisticated in understanding the essential issues of business dealings. Think about it: The type of confidence does an investor have within an entrepreneur who doesn’t even understand the worthiness of her company? Therefore the first priority ought to be to open the dialogue predicated on a starting value supplied by the firm owner.
In the other case, some owners enter into the investment discussions with a value that’s merely based on a straightforward formula such as for example "3 x annual sales," "four times net assets" or "six times earnings." But those multiples aren’t the foundation for the firm’s value. Instead, they are usually reported as the quick summary after finding a detailed valuation. For instance, once a formal, comprehensive valuation is completed, as it happens that the worthiness is a particular multiple of the firm’s sales, assets or earnings, in order that gets quoted when people say, "We’re doing the offer at four times sales." But you start with a simple multiple will not provide the broad overview of cash flows, industry analysis and business risks had a need to set up a firm value.
Entrepreneurs must make a solid effort to accumulate a good file of supporting evidence about the business’s tangible risk exposure and positioning. When the problem of the firm’s value (and the percentage stake the investment represents) becomes the heart of the discussions with the funding source, the entrepreneur is in a more advantageous situation when he has several files filled with tangible and credible data to aid the valuation. Reports from trade publications about the marketplace, articles from magazines about your competition and state of product technologies, or government studies about the labor and capital issues affecting the industry are examples of such alternative party evidence. Other items could add a report on all competitors and suppliers, some recent figures on sales of comparable firms, market values for similar publicly traded companies or a university study about local business trends and impacts. The main element focus here’s that the entrepreneur must be the main one educating the investors about the risks and company position, instead of getting the investors come to the table with all the current pertinent data showing the dog owner why the firm must have a particular valuation.
Finally, don’t neglect this basic rule: Negotiate everything. Because an investor quotes "35 percent" as the targeted equity stake doesn’t mean that is the final figure. A well-prepared entrepreneur who includes a formal independent valuation and some folders worth of alternative party supporting documentation about the business’s risks and market status is in an excellent position to own starting figure for what stake the potential investment represents. If the investors make an effort to start the discussions with their own figure, it is extremely reasonable to anticipate that the firm owner will counter offering and provide a good basis for that lower percentage. If entrepreneurs go in to the deal unprepared, then there is absolutely no one to blame so you can get stuck at a higher percentage equity stake. So negotiate everything before funding deal reflects a sound model and good supporting evidence for the worthiness.
David Newton is a professor of entrepreneurial finance and head of the entrepreneurship program, which he founded in 1990, at Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California. The writer of four books on both entrepreneurship and finance investments, David was formerly a contributing editor on growth capital for Industry Week Growing Companies magazine and has contributed to such publications as Entrepreneur , YOUR CASH , Success , Red Herring , Business Week , Inc. and Solutions. He’s also consulted to nearly 100 emerging, fast-growth entrepreneurial ventures since 1984.
The opinions expressed in this column are those of the writer, not of Entrepreneur.com. All email address details are designed to be general in nature, without regard to specific geographical areas or circumstances, and really should only be relied upon after consulting a proper expert, such as a lawyer or accountant.